News Intelligence Analysis
From Common Cause
Malfunction and Malfeasance:
A Report on the Electronic Voting Machine Debacle
[Read the whole report by clicking here]
This report surveys four major studies that reviewed DRE voting machine security and reliability. Two of the reports involved extensive review of more than 80 academic, technical, and industry reports on DREs. Each report concluded DRE machines to be vulnerable to malfunction and also to tampering in which a computer-savvy hacker with minimal access to the machine could introduce malicious code to the DRE software and change the results of an election. Such manipulation could be undetectable. In machines equipped with a modem, it could even be done from a remote location.
Furthermore, there have been at least seven reported occasions since 2002 in which electronic voting machines added or removed votes in real elections, calling into question the final results of a race. For example, this spring, as states across the country conducted primary elections, a programming error caused a DRE in Tarrant County, Texas, to record an additional 100,000 votes that were never actually cast. The election outcome is being challenged by a candidate who lost by 6,000 votes.
Despite the security problems and serious malfunctions, in November DRE machines will be used in 37 states, with 39 percent of voters expected to vote on them. In many of these states, there are no adequate safeguards in place. State law either does not require the voting system to produce a voter-verified paper ballot or does not require a statistically meaningful and transparent audit process. These states are at risk of compromised elections due to DRE malfunction or tampering.
This report includes a chart detailing the status of each state, along with a chart detailing the level of risk for voters in each state, and chart showing which medium and high risk states allow no-excuse absentee voting.
To address these problems, Common Cause makes eight recommendations:
1) Congress should immediately pass HR 550, "The Voter Confidence
and Increased Accessibility Act of 2005."
2) States should pass laws or adopt regulations requiring all voting
systems to produce a voter verifiable paper ballot and mandate
that at least a random two percent of voting jurisdictions conduct
public audits of their voting systems.
3) Election officials should take necessary steps to safeguard machines
prior to Election Day.
4) State election officials should, wherever possible, immediately retrofit
DREs with printing systems to produce a voter verifiable paper
ballot, and use those ballots in audits.
5) In the instance where DREs cannot be retrofitted, Common Cause
recommends that state election officials decertify those DREs that
cannot provide a paper record and turn to other voting systems
such as optical scan machines for the November elections.
6) Congress and states should make emergency funds available for
purchase or lease of more secure, auditable machines.
7) Voters should be encouraged to vote on paper whenever possible.
If facing the prospect of voting on paperless DREs in November,
they should advocate for change with local election officials
well before the election. If that does not work, where possible,
voters should vote by absentee ballot.
8) Regardless of the voting equipment in a jurisdiction, citizens
should vote. While there is a chance that a vote won't be counted if
cast on a paperless DRE, not voting at all will assure that it is not.
Send a letter to the editor about this article Part III. Articles Analyzing Voting Machine Election Fraud Potential
This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Back to The Yurica Report Home Page
Copyright © 2006 Yurica Report. All rights
reserved.